Subject	and to defend myself, it's not really even proven
Posted by	ZLover4Life on October 05, 2003 at 11:06 PM
	This message has been viewed 22 times.
In Reply To	20 hp DROP in 96, not boost (n/m) posted by ZLover4Life on October 05, 2003 at 11:04 PM
Message	I don't want the 96 onwers to start shit again like last time I posted this =) Most people say 91-95 is desirable, but they're really all the same (with the exception of the 96 model not having variable valve timing - if you care) "all street races have three sides to the story... the one owners side, the other onwers side, and the truth" - Posted by gtclk on August 22, 2003 at 4:44 PM
Follow Ups	Any best year? - jeffn 22:56:39 10/05/03 20 hp DROP in 96, not boost (n/m) - ZLover4Life 23:04:46 10/05/03 and to defend myself, it's not really even proven - ZLover4Life 23:06:33 10/05/03 don't forget that 96 are OBDII - fourZero 23:08:46 10/05/03 yeah, but JWT did just release theirs =) (n/m) - ZLover4Life 23:09:53 10/05/03 true, but no ZEM support as of yet - fourZero 23:11:45 10/05/03 Re: yeah, but JWT did just release theirs =) - jeffn 23:18:51 10/05/03 I was unaware that they DIDN'T have one, thought they did (n/m) - ZLover4Life 23:20:18 10/05/03 Actually, the lower plenum & injector changes in 94/95 - boileralum 23:38:23 10/05/03 good point (n/m) - ZLover4Life 00:39:50 10/06/03 i always thought that up to 93 - THAyz1 23:10:56 10/05/03 from the FAQ - fourZero 23:17:14 10/05/03 A '95 with a '93 ECU. (n/m) - SooperZ95 12:32:09 10/06/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.